
Objects, be they monunents in a town, furniture in a house, clothing for
the body, utensils for everyday life, all have been human accoutrements
since time immemorial. They have evolved with the progress of civilizations
and cultures. Following on the era of the Industrial Revolution, profound
mutations have occurred in our time, due to the emergence of "intelligent"
objects, such as satellites, computers, faxes, cards with a memory...
Added to this are vital questions posed by our earth which exhausts its
energy, and also by the emergence of markets linked to the quality of objects,
their meaning as well as their usage.
Will these upheavals lead corporate chiefs to rethink their activities ?
Will they espouse these new ideas, following in the footsteps of inventors,
architects and designers whose role is no longer confined to isolated creation
or linked to the existence of one product but who are proof of a re-examination
of the meaning of today's world ?
This book is not so much intended to prove a theory, to defend an argument
or arrive at useful solutions. Rather, it serves to underline an existing
situation, to reveal contradictions and to question paradoxes. It highlights
that productive relationship, both necessary and creative, which exists
- or shoulds exist, and do so more widely, behond the nine case histories
presented here - between the worlds of industry and design.
THE SIMILAR AND THE DIFFERENT
The most striking logic of industry can be resumed in the principle of
series. Small, medium or large, the repetition of sameness produces economies
of scale and permits industry to continue within the strict laws of profitability
which are its own, thus guaranteeing its existence and survival.
Over several decades, the logic of the corporation, based on costs, has
revealed itself under two aspects.
On the one hand, the cost of production, on the other, the cost of advertising
to allow the product to exist, or rather to promote the product to the
gratest number.
Little by little, however, corporations which are the most sensitive to
changes in society, have begun to perceive the necessity of product identity.
And gradually, the product itself has embodied its own communication.
It has become charged with meaning, with signs, with personality, the
contrary of the pure theory of functionalism, but not neglecting the function.
Along with the need to offer objects which tell a story, differences must
be stressed.
Today, state-of-the-art industries no longer reason in terms of one market
but of several markets, regrouping variable cultural identities.
THE INNOVATIVE PRODUCT AND THE STAR PRODUCT
To conceive of this product with a difference, industrial executives consult
designers-creators who accept a part of the risk and do not conceive of
the object only in a dialetic of function and esthetics. They also add
an ethical conception, of art put to use, and of usage considered as an
art.
Then the eternal question of time enters in.
To what point is an innovative product acceptable to a
market even when it seeks to renew it ?
Certainly, form and appearance are not the only issue ; there is also
function and the concept of the object, its usage and its image, a play
of mirrors between the individual and an object which responds to a demand,
or reveals it, or even invents it.
At this interface between the known and the new, the past and the future,
the program and the project, the work of the designers begins.
THE IRRATIONAL AND THE PROFITABLE
Creation contains its necessary share of the irrational. No matter how
they work, designers, architects and creators all speak of the moment
of intuition which no thought, no theory can circumscribe. The most rational
process, the most structured and the most conscious of constraints passes
through this phase which cannot be objective but which precisely defines
the creators, his capacity to crystalize all the givens into a personal
alchemy unlike anything before. This mingling of mystery, of langage and
of emotion, is at the opposite end of standardization. Yet, no matter
how diverse and intelligent, the industrial approach involves standardization,
which is inherent to it.
The dialogue between industrialists and creators thus results from a paradox
which the product incarnates and transcends when it reaches its goal.
How do these protagonists, both opposite and inseparable, confront one
another, stand up to one another, and eventually come to terms with one
another in order to create a product ?
By means of a dialogue, perhaps closest to that which this book demonstrates.
Relationship : the nine industrialists
and the nine creators relate their visions and define their roles, each
one offering a different viewpoint. What then follows is the story of
a product developped in common. Between this dialogue, questions remain,
areas to explore, meaningful or empty, both the magic and the real, a
space for reflection, and a reality which concerns the economy as a whole
and the environment.
The stakes are real.
THE STAKES
For the industrialist, profitability today comes up against challenges
which are not only those posed by the consumer alone. Profitability requires
new attitudes.
Thus, at the end of the 20th century, one must ask : will consumption
achieve the utopia of modernists, the union of beauty and utility, the
passage from multiplicity of objects and from over-consumption, to the
intrinsic quality of multi-purpose objects ?
At the same time, the cultural role of industry becomes clearer. Industry
will shape the immadiate and future environment. Stimulated by a sense
of utility, production becomes a discussion about the real, and about
the culture of the present on the move. Yet, products thus fashioned by
the artisan, then manufactured and finally mass-produced, must assure
continuity, the marriage of tradition with modernity.
For the creators, the stakes are no less high. Certain among them reflect
on what they call "disappearance". Weighed down, attacked by
an excess of objects, the world is condemned to study the minimal. The
minimum of matter, the maximum of service. The chapter devoted to the
credit card with an electronic memory demonstrates this logic. The object
is only a surface, while the function, invisible and inwardly focussed,
provides intelligent action.
Even so, a language of objects exists and is more than ever necessary,
the echo, the reflection or the revealer of identities.
Between the sensitive object with its irrational component and the object
of pure immateriality with its strict intelligence, where does one situate
the project and its meaning today ?
 |
|